Evidence

Income category

Cross cutting impact

MCDSS/GTZ (2007) Pilot cash transfer scheme: Kalomo district Zambia [Quantitative] 7 times as many households owned goats and the ownership for chickens increased by 15% points by EPRI Assets Livelihoods LIC
MCDSS/GTZ (2007) Pilot cash transfer scheme: Kalomo district Zambia [Quantitative] asset ownership increased from 4.2 assets at the baseline to 5.2 at the time of evaluation by EPRI Assets Livelihoods LIC
Devereux et al. (2006) Rural Maintenance Programme (RMP) Bangladesh [Qualitative] introducing bank accounts for poor women has facilitated their savings behaviour and provided them with access to formal financial institutions, which they would not otherwise have had by EPRI Assets Livelihoods LIC Gender (1)
Oxfam (2005) Oxfam Cash-for-Food Afghanistan 2003-2004 Afghanistan [Qualitative] the cash was not generally used for building up assets by EPRI Assets Livelihoods LIC
Devereux et al. (2006) Maharashtra Employment Guarantee Scheme (MEGS) India [Qualitative] there have been improvements in agricultural land as a result of assets constructed or maintained under the programme by EPRI Assets Livelihoods LIC (2)
MCDSS/GTZ (2007) Pilot cash transfer scheme: Kalomo district Zambia [Quantitative] those households forced to sell their assets in order to afford food during the three months before the survey was conducted fell by 4% by EPRI Assets Livelihoods LIC
Budlender et al. (2006) Child Support Grant South Africa [Quantitative] 7.6% of beneficiaries spent a minimum of one hour in the previous week collecting water, as opposed to 7.3% of non-beneficiaries (according to the 2004 General Household Survey) by EPRI Child Labour Livelihoods MIC
Budlender et al. (2006) Child Support Grant South Africa [Quantitative] 8.0% of African beneficiaries spent a minimum of one hour in the previous week collecting water, as opposed to 9.5% of African non-beneficiaries (according to the 2004 General Household Survey) by EPRI Child Labour Livelihoods MIC
Lindert (2005) PRAF (Family Assistance Program) Honduras [Quantitative] Child labour among boys was 11% when receiving PRAF compared to 12% among non-beneficiaries (Olinto, 2004). by EPRI Child Labour Livelihoods LIC (1)
Lindert (2005) Oportunidades Mexico [Quantitative] Child labour among boys was 19% when receiving Oportunidades compared to 22% among non-beneficiaries (Olinto, 2004). by EPRI Child Labour Livelihoods MIC
581 results found - showing page 1 of 59